Parkland One Year Later: The Government Has Blood On Their Hands Rally for our Rights Colorado
Today marks one year since the United States saw a school massacre that broke the hearts of a nation, ignited a fire in new activists, and if you’re paying attention – shattered your trust in government.  That massacre being the Parkland, Florida school shooting where 19 year old Nikolas Cruz took the lives of 14 classmates and three teachers.

On February 14th, 2018 Nikolas Cruz took an Uber with a backpack equipped with an AR-15, grenades, and ammo to his old school.  He walked past the school security monitor, Andrew Medina, who knew he wasn’t allowed on school grounds and found his presence “suspicious”, although did nothing.  Cruz walked past the building where school resource officer, Scot Peterson, was talking with another student.  Peterson was employed as a sheriff’s deputy with the Broward County Sheriff’s Department, but his charge was to protect the students at Parkland High School.  It should also be noted that Peterson was the only armed person permitted to be on school grounds.  Cruz walked through the unsecured school doors into his former high school from which he’d been expelled.  In this gun free zone not one person attempted to stop him, nor was there any security measures in place.  At 2:21 pm he opened fire.  It was a rampage that would last at least 20 minutes before Cruz simply walked out of the school and into a nearby neighborhood, where he was eventually captured and confessed.

Heartbreaking.  How can this kind of tragedy happen?  It shouldn’t have.  And it wouldn’t have if the government had done their job.  

The Parkland High School Shooting spurred a gun control movement this country hasn’t seen in decades.  March for our Lives formed under umbrella groups Moms Demand Action and Everytown For Gun Safety, all which are funded by Michael Bloomberg, have taken to the streets and the halls of congress.  Frantic and misguided students, parents, teachers and individuals have exploited the Parkland tragedy calling for massive gun control across the nation – from city ordinances to federal laws.  What they should be acknowledging instead is the complete and utter government failure that allowed Parkland to happen in the first place. More laws were not needed. The current laws simply needed to be enforced.

The government has blood on their hands, and as a mother I say that unapologetically.  

• Nikolas Cruz was not a stranger to Broward County law enforcement.  In fact, police had been called to his home at least 37 times over the course of only a few years. 37 TIMES!  The reasons ranged from harming animals (shooting chickens with a pellet gun), assault on his mother, assault on his siblings, harming himself, threatening to harm himself, threatening to harm others, and more.  Not once was he charged.  Not once did the police take any action, even though action on almost all of these would have required his name to be entered into the NICS database preventing him from legally being able to purchase a firearm.

• In addition to the 37 reports law enforcement did follow up on (although ultimately ignored in the end), in February 2016 a tipster called Broward Sheriff’s Office to say Cruz ‘could be a school shooter in the making’ and had been making threats on Instagram, but deputies did not write up a report on that warning, instead they forwarded it to School Resource Officer Scot Peterson. That report came just weeks after a relative called urging Broward Sheriff’s Office to investigate if he should have the weapons he had, and possibly seize them.  In the end, both reports were ignored.

• Late in 2016 a “peer counselor” reported to School Resource Officer Scot Peterson that Cruz had possibly ingested gasoline in a suicide attempt, was cutting himself and wanted to buy a gun. A mental health counselor advised against involuntarily committing Cruz.  In Florida, such action can be done under the Baker Act, which allows the state to involuntarily commit individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others. People committed under the Baker Act are legally barred from obtaining firearms.  This event was followed up on by Florida Department of Children and Families, and even though he had fresh cuts from “cutting” and his mother shared her fear that he constantly talked of wanting to buy a firearm, he was deemed stable and, once again, ignored.

• In September 2017 a YouTube user named “nikolas cruz” postsed a comment stating he wanted to become a “professional school shooter.” The comment was reported to the FBI in Mississippi, but was not followed up on.

• In November 2017 a family member called Broward County Sheriff’s Office to report that Nikolas Cruz was dangerous, had made legitimate threats, and had weapons.  Her concerns were ignored when Cruz told them he’d give the weapons to a family friend.  This again would have been a legitimate use of the Baker Act.

• Also in November 2017, after Cruz’ mother died, he was taken in by a Palm Beach County family.  They contacted the Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office to report a fight between Cruz and their 22 year old son. A member of the family said that Cruz had threatened to “get his gun and come back” and that he had “put the gun to others’ heads in the past.” The family did not want him arrested, so the report was ignored.

And again in November 2017 a caller from Massachusetts reported that Cruz is collecting guns and knives and was threatening to be a “school shooter in the making.” A Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy advised the caller to contact the Palm Beach sheriff.  If the caller ever did contact Palm Beach, it’s not on record.

• In January 5, 2018 a report came in to the FBI’s tip line claiming that Cruz has “a desire to kill people” and could potentially conduct a school shooting. The information was never passed on to the FBI’s office in Miami.  The FBI has even publicly acknowledged their failure.

And these are only the failures BEFORE the incident.  Since the incident it has come to light that:

• The only other armed person on school grounds, resource officer Scot Peterson, hid behind a concrete wall during the rampage.

• School Security Monitor, Andrew Medina, had a long history of sexually harassing female students, all which was swept under the rug.

• Broward County Sheriff took 26 minutes to enter to the school.

• Nikolas Cruz was easily able to walk out of the school, blending in with other students and walked into a nearby neighborhood, where he was later arrested.

• After a lawsuit against the Broward County Sheriff’s Department, the school district, and Parkland High, a judge determined that NONE of these entities had a responsibility to protect the students.

You would think after all of this, those closest to the tragedy would be asking why – and how – this kind of failure is possible.  You would think that in the change they wish to see, the government would be the last place they’d be seeking it.  I mean, what makes them think anything will change?  History shows it won’t and it doesn’t, and, in fact,  nearly every mass shooting the US has seen government failure like this exist behind it.

Even last summer during a counter protest Rally for our Rights held while March for our Lives was staging a “March on the NRA”, a conversation afterward between myself and the organizers of the other event resulted in agreement that these failures exist, and that before we discuss new laws, we should be discussing why our current laws are failing.

What is the solution?  We need to acknowledge our society has a violence problem and a suicide problem, but to call it a gun problem is disingenuous.  To create gun control laws that disarm and effect only the law abiding is a false sense of security.  Mental health is a strong component of this issue.  Any individual who will walk into a school and execute students is mentally ill, even if not previously diagnosed.

We have soft targets in schools such as Parkland, where someone like Cruz can simply wander in with nothing in his way, and not one person inside the school is legally given the ability to defend the students they care for as their own.  Programs such as FASTER Colorado provides no cost or low cost intensive training to school staff who voluntarily choose to be armed and is approved by their school board.  They are also provided with deep concealment training, trauma training, and psychological training.

In the end, we will never eradicate evil, but we can defend ourselves from it.  

 

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

8 thoughts on “Parkland One Year Later: The Government Has Blood On Their Hands

  1. Richard Shepherd says:

    A great article full of truthful evidence that common sense people recognize.
    Unfortunately, these incidents are used by those who wish to exert control over the law abiding populace.
    They use these incidents to create the hysteria necessary to drive through legislation necessary to exert the control and disarmament laws necessary.
    We each need to contact every legislator supporting additional gun control to voice our opinion .
    Today, I received an email from CD 2 Rep Joe Neguese , which touted the need for universal background checks, which already exist in Colorado , and that 34 people die each day due to gun violence. I emailed him that two thirds of that number are suicides, not homicides, and 80% of the remainder of the number are homicides by hardened career type criminals.
    I reprimanded him for using false statistics .
    I predict he will not correct his errors .
    He will turn out , I believe, to be someone who supports an authoritarian socialist govt

  2. Patriot Solutions says:

    Supreme Court has ruled Law Enforcement are under no legal obligation to protect any citizen.
    If cops are not required to confront shooters then why are we paying them?
    What good is LE other than to write traffic citations?
    Oh, that’s right they’re there to criminalize and fleece the law abiding into submission.
    My attorney says that at least 50% of 911 callers get cited for a criminal offense.
    Well, imagine my surprise!

  3. Patriot Solutions says:

    I still can’t find language in the 2nd amendment that states one person has any right to take or prohibit another’s firearms over something possibly said. Quite the contrary in fact. Chickens get killed prior to being placed in freezer bags for the grocery store. Muslims are burning live animals to death in Denver, it’s on the news. Peloton says millions will die if she doesn’t get her way and Oprah says kill white people. Can turn on social media and death threats are rampantly stated. Broward County Sheriffs dept is on social media arming the mosque people telling them to carry concealed without a permit that it is their Constitutional right to do so. I believe everybody has the right to arms because it states this precisely in the Constitution. Words aren’t weapons. They can’t make an idiot stop saying stupid things because it is a right. If 30+ visits to a house rendered no citations/arrests then perhaps no crimes were committed therefore the taking of rights not justified by any measure.
    Pretty sure Florida might have a Red Flag gun grab law now for those who think they are the thought police.
    Ultimately if a credible threat was made and ignored look to who did the ignoring and look to who failed in response due to no requirement by law to protect citizens.
    I get angry listening to people that think they are entitled to take others possessions away for something stated or because they think they have rights to infringe upon another because it suits their agenda. I want you to go look up the words “inalienable rights” and explain to me how they are defined to taking of such?
    Broward cowards mistake was not preparing to protect citizens then also refusing to do. Perhaps they weee simply too busy arming up mosque attendees like the video of them doing so on social media. Perhaps somebody should investigate that and take action. The moral of the story is be armed and when a wacko tries to kill you blow the sob straight to hell. When I was a kid in Florida we all had guns and knew how to use them but liberals made guns sound bad and now kids are victims of liberal lunacy. Unarmed victims for the slaughter. Ted Nugent says one thing I like” when I arrive in gun free zones they cease to exist”. Amen to that brother!

  4. Patriot Solutions says:

    Not peloton, Pelosi.
    Darn checker!

    The solution to violence is not less guns IT IS MORE GUNS!!!

    THE FEAR OF GETTING BLOWN AWAY CURTAILS VIOLENCE.

    Shall not be infringed!!!!!!!

    Not even by thought police or joe public because of words. Words don’t kill!

    Failure to provide personal safety for yourself is your own fault.

    There were no school shootings when we took our guns to school every day and hunted along the road going there both ways.

    Guns should be issued to every American by the government at a very early age if not born with them in hand to kill the abortionist vaccinators.

  5. Patriot Solutions says:

    And to go a step further beyond liberal interpretations of wording that does not exist please show me the words in the 2nd Amendment that require law abiding persons can only have this right. Show me, I’m waiting.
    Colorado restores full rights to those who committed a felony upon successful completion of sentance and Article 4, section 2 of US Constitution guarantees equal rights in a state to each citizen which does restore out of state felons rights that move here. Gov doesn’t want you to know these things because it interferes with their anti gun agenda.
    Continued liberal interpretation of these facts will keep the debate going on and on. One person thinking they have the right to infringe upon another’s inalienable right in a good lesson in futility.
    Go ahead and keep spinning in the liberalism, it is not survivable.

    1. Patriot Solutions says:

      2nd Amendment is not a tool to disarm any person for any reason. It does not descriminate like most pro gun rights groups. It applies equally to all because the right to life comes from God not man nor pro rights group or gov. Man has no authority over who has this right to life because it is Gods will. 2nd Amendment lays the foundation for protecting ones life and it is disgraceful that people are yawing it as a tool to have gov disarm those who they fear because seeking protection from the gov is not what the 2nd Amendment is about by any means. Socialist society simply wants gov to protect them by taking guns and it is failed policy. None of you are God and not one of you has the right to infringe upon another’s rights for any reason. You gun lovers have them so use them on a nut job when you need to that is your 2nd Amendment right. Sissy’s that require the state to protect them and are willing to give up the rights of others (and their own by default) deserve neither.
      Suck it up!

  6. Patriot Solutions says:

    And to further clarify the facts Obama had a policy that LE were to not arrest or cite kids that were potentially dangerous for the purpose of promoting future manifestation of criminal behavior such as with the Parkland shooter. Kids like him were hands off to the cops protected by Obama to promote gun control. And look how good this Obama policy works, even the gun rights groups get on board and go after the gun when in fact Obama was complicit and walks away laughing because even the pro gun groups use the propaganda Obama produced to fuel the gun debate. Obama made this policy under the pretense that it was best to not give these kids a criminal record that could harm their future.
    But by all means go ahead and march on with the gun control confiscation rhetoric and help the gun grabbers fulfill their anti gun agenda while the real criminal walks away Scott free laughing because you drink his koolaid once again.

  7. Patriot Solutions says:

    It was about 16 years ago possibly when in Park County Colorado a girl was taken hostage at the local high school by a gun man. Her name was Emily. She was murdered that day at school while hundreds of Colorado cops were hiding out in the parking lot. No attempt to confront the gun man. No legal requirements to act. Emily got a nice parade.

    Notice any similarities?

    Cops in charge got medals for bravery.

    Girl got box.

    It’s disgusting how all sides use the propaganda while denying the real facts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *